Maritime Security in Southeast Asia Law of the Sea Perspective

hello everyone it's abrilia and welcome back to my channel so today I'm going to tell you about the conceptualization of Maritime Security in Sodus Asia in this article there will be divided into this sections the first is Convergence and Divergence and the implication of convergence and diversions okay well the first I will explain the convergence and Divergence in Saudis Asia okay Maritime security has emerged as a central Concept in Southwest Asia's policy lexicon however as is the case in much of the world the terms precise meaning is not consistently clear which challenges and state activities should be categorized as Maritime security and which should be considered elements of another domain is general and because this ambiguity can be useful to leaders seeking to build Unity of action among government agencies with overlapping Maritime policy mandates and two diplomats seeking to rely on a I'm sorry um you famous the qualities to support flexible political narratives that minimize the risk associated with security dilemmas however sexually Mystic poly semi only works for so long and interjust risked left unclarified terms will develop as to assumed meanings okay for example many service Asians regard Contemporary American talk about Maritime security as thin fail for something further understood as great power competition at sea therefore even the most beginning initiative are factored into rational calculations aimed at balancing between extra external powers with the region it is also possible for lexical disconnect to lead to problematic misinterpretations of policy intent and diplomatic signals recognizing that understanding the varied conceptualizations of Maritime security is an academic puzzle with real world practical implication in Southwest Asia the S Roger Rodman School of International Studies can confirmed a round table of expert to take stock of rational Maritime security definitions this specialist National policy documents and policy maker discourse to assess how 

Maritime security is defined used and conceptualist in 7K service ancient Coastal States there are such as the Philippines Vietnam Brunei Malaysia Indonesia Singapore and Thailand Asian as a multinational institution and the quad members such as Australia Japan India and the United States this stock taking enabled the team to Identify and discuss the significance of the convergence and disretances nothing that trans translational nature of discourse the phrase Southeast Asian conceptualization was adopted as a short time this doesn't specifically mean usage by subtest Asian individuals or the richest National governments but refers to the security related discourse taking place in the region while the primary goal of the project was to improve communication to provide common preference points the project also it is I'm Sorry by providing common reference points the project also discovered findings of practical policy importance and then the implications of convergence and dispersions okay former senior fellow in the error rsis Maritime security program Commodore some betterment or air a n r e t t observed over a decade ago that a fundamental issue that arises when considering Maritime security is the lack of an accredit definition of the term Maritime security writing about Maritime Security in 

Southwest Asia Dr Batman noted that Regional states have have been unable to agree unpreciously what constituent elements should and should not be covered by the definition he further noted that several issues that appear to be minor Maritime security challenges such as different interpretations of key elements of the law of the sea dispute record recording certain Maritime zones and maintaining Goods order Etsy are actually issues that define solution and hence he called them the weak problems of Maritime security these observation remains even more valid in the present day the discussion of this rsis round table reveal that the k-costal Southeast Asian States conceive of Maritime security as a comprehensive concept that encompasses all risk to the prosperity of the state and Nation at sea this include State non-state and environmental threats the activity is taken within the conceptual framework of Maritime security include military actions policing and socio-economic development Regional states are concerned about Chinese actions there's reason there's a foreign rights and responsibilities but aren't seeking to develop their Maritime security capacities exclusively as a response to China instead they focus on advancing opportunities to enabling the socio-economic development of their Maritime Space by keeping the water safe secure and free of foreign influence in contrast the quad members concept 

Maritime security a bit more narrowly focusing activities is counter threats pushed by both state and non-state actors of course without formal definition this distinction must be considered a generalization and cannot be regarded as absolute someone has clear definition are liking Regional policy makers will have to continue benefiting from the options created by ambiguity Wellness testing around the real dangers of equifocation okay let me start ambiguous usage of the term American Security has certain advantages domestically affect you Omnibus usage can encourage coordination between various agencies holding sticks in Maritime Affairs while avoiding focus on specific tasking that may highlight differing mandates personal authorities are enable undesirable inter Indonesian competition however this usually only avoids bureaucratic conflict rather than addressing the issue needed for truly coordinated in their agency action visit the national definition of Maritime security to provide the 

Strategic context stakeholder naturally combated for highly value tax and for it deals with lower institutional reward furthermore a lack of definition means the objectives are difficult to Define and progress is impossible to measure this can lead to problems developing and resourcing effective strategies when used in foreign policy and because usage can promote Maritime cooperation without requiring faulted confliction of thorny considerations such as territorial disputes differing positions on appropriate interpretations of international law and so foreignty sensitives determinary time security is sometimes used in service as she has policy discourse as a preferring prefabrication to discuss issue without directly naming the threat the clearest example of this would be the main the many diplomatic statements regarding Maritime security concerns in the South China Sea okay that's all about the conceptualization of service Asia uh thanks for watching don't forget to like comment and subscribe this channel to get more information see you the next article and bye-bye

Berbagi :